Skip to main content

i don’t disagree, as a generality

the problem with mash-ups... is that once you get past both “oh, that’s unexpected” and “that must have been difficult,” what you”re left with is a dj with really fucking terrible taste in music.
jwz blog entry
Wikipedia on Mash-ups.

Comments

  1. Have you heard the mash-up of "3 AM Eternal" and "Ace of Spades," though?

    ReplyDelete
  2. No, I've not yet heard that one. Got a link to it?

    It is a shame so many mashes, the majority it seems, focus on Eminem, 50-Cent, and Brittney Spears. There are SO MANY good mash-ups out there that don't go that route.

    Lately I've been enjoying the Bootle Beatlegs mashes of Monkees and Beatles, and A Night at the Hip-Hopera. There was also an originally created version of Louis Armstrong doing "Oops I Did It Again" that I blogged prior to the trip.

    Lots of good stuff is there if you look. I'm a fan of mash-ups, but the signal-to-noise ratio is frequently poor.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Here's the direct link: http://gyllerfelt.se/data/Divide_&_Kreate_-_Eternal_spades.mp3

    I think I came across your blog on Tribe.net a while back.

    ReplyDelete
  4. That's pretty damned cool. Thanks!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tony diTerlizzi and classic D&D monsters

The sixth entry of his series on drawings of classic D&D monsters is up. He's one of my favorite fantasy artists. His work tends toward the charming and cozy, rather than others' focus on machismo or melodrama.

sad fate

“Our legendary personalities are evergreen ‘brands’ with the benefit of worldwide recognition,” reads a message on the Richman agency’s website. Guardian UK Article *vomits* Where is the line drawn between “public figure” and “celebrity”? How can a dead person have an agent, particulary where there are no specific works concerned other than a sense of character? It’s one thing to insist that Duck Soup is a work that should be protected (which any more simply means controlled by whomever has the most buX0rs), but shouldn’t personalities and such pass into the public domain as well? ( boingboing : Bill Gates 0wns Einstein, Groucho , Freud, Asimov, Fuller, et al )

on sheeps and androids

The movie Blade Runner is very dear to my heart. It is a treatise on the nature of existence expanding on, and perhaps exceeding the reach of the Phillip K. Dick work which inspired it, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? Perhaps I have missed out on some greater subtlety of PKD's work, but the point of DADoES pursues the definition of fake, while Blade Runner instead focuses on what is real. Where the replicants in the novel are sociopathic monsters who emulate emotions solely to gain traction against humans who may hunt them, the humans there rely on machines to dictate their own emotions for them. They dial for "energetic determination" or "six-hour self-accusatory depression." As much as the replicants are machines incapable of real emotion, humans are similarly reliant on a machine to simulate emotion for them. In contrast, the movie's central them is spelled out for us in Deckard's apartment, when Rachel is playing the piano. She professe...