Skip to main content

a dubious achievement

Garfield Randomizer’s random-cell output is at least as funny as the actual comic.
Labels:

Comments

  1. Anonymous1/15/2006 4:47 AM

    I only wish we could save and share our results. I've found some charmingly surreal bits so far.

    ReplyDelete
  2. bwana1/15/2006 10:42 AM

    Well, for saving on a Windows PC, you can hit PrintScrn key, which copies the current screen, cursor and all, to the clipboard. Then you can open it in whatever (Photoshop, PC Paintbrush, etc.) and crop it to just be the comics.

    Then you can post it to Flickr for free.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous1/15/2006 7:09 PM

    D'oh! I will have to try that. Thanks!

    I'd managed to get an unsettlingly recursive one created that started with Garfield screaming "I must go back in time so this never happens!" that ended with him looking worried and thinking "Am I?". Perhaps I can recreate it. We shall see.

    . . . I have way too much free time on my hands.

    ReplyDelete
  4. bwana1/15/2006 9:48 PM

    You could always write something...

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tony diTerlizzi and classic D&D monsters

The sixth entry of his series on drawings of classic D&D monsters is up. He's one of my favorite fantasy artists. His work tends toward the charming and cozy, rather than others' focus on machismo or melodrama.
Post a Comment
Read more

sad fate

“Our legendary personalities are evergreen ‘brands’ with the benefit of worldwide recognition,” reads a message on the Richman agency’s website. Guardian UK Article *vomits* Where is the line drawn between “public figure” and “celebrity”? How can a dead person have an agent, particulary where there are no specific works concerned other than a sense of character? It’s one thing to insist that Duck Soup is a work that should be protected (which any more simply means controlled by whomever has the most buX0rs), but shouldn’t personalities and such pass into the public domain as well? ( boingboing : Bill Gates 0wns Einstein, Groucho , Freud, Asimov, Fuller, et al )
Post a Comment
Read more

on sheeps and androids

The movie Blade Runner is very dear to my heart. It is a treatise on the nature of existence expanding on, and perhaps exceeding the reach of the Phillip K. Dick work which inspired it, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? Perhaps I have missed out on some greater subtlety of PKD's work, but the point of DADoES pursues the definition of fake, while Blade Runner instead focuses on what is real. Where the replicants in the novel are sociopathic monsters who emulate emotions solely to gain traction against humans who may hunt them, the humans there rely on machines to dictate their own emotions for them. They dial for "energetic determination" or "six-hour self-accusatory depression." As much as the replicants are machines incapable of real emotion, humans are similarly reliant on a machine to simulate emotion for them. In contrast, the movie's central them is spelled out for us in Deckard's apartment, when Rachel is playing the piano. She professe...
Post a Comment
Read more