Skip to main content

fair use?

The company that makes the backup utility gamesXcopy is being sued by an assortment of major publishers. I'm very interested to see how this turns out, since the application appears to take significant pains to prevent piracy, though ESA president Doug Lowenstein says, What's at stake here is a rather important legal principle--that products with no purpose other than to circumvent copyright protection are illegal." I wonder if this is a misquote, or if he mispoke. The application copies games, and circumvents copy protection to that end, but not specifically copyrights, which have already been held to be legally open to backup for personal use under the fair use doctrine.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Tony diTerlizzi and classic D&D monsters

The sixth entry of his series on drawings of classic D&D monsters is up. He's one of my favorite fantasy artists. His work tends toward the charming and cozy, rather than others' focus on machismo or melodrama.

sad fate

“Our legendary personalities are evergreen ‘brands’ with the benefit of worldwide recognition,” reads a message on the Richman agency’s website. Guardian UK Article *vomits* Where is the line drawn between “public figure” and “celebrity”? How can a dead person have an agent, particulary where there are no specific works concerned other than a sense of character? It’s one thing to insist that Duck Soup is a work that should be protected (which any more simply means controlled by whomever has the most buX0rs), but shouldn’t personalities and such pass into the public domain as well? ( boingboing : Bill Gates 0wns Einstein, Groucho , Freud, Asimov, Fuller, et al )